DAO Integrity Monitor
● GREEN
Loading…
Peself = −77
5 wipe conditions
0 / 26 kill conditions triggered
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH

Threat Status

Composite integrity level for the MoreRight DAO. Derived from framework math: wipe condition proximity, prediction market Pe_implied signal, and external trigger flags. The architecture that keeps Pe_self = −77 negative under adversarial pressure.

Kill Conditions Self-Score (Pe=−77) Prediction Markets ◈

Composite Threat Level

Loading threat status…

Pe Trajectory — Pe_self vs Pe_implied

Loading…

Aggregation Formula (Versioned — Methodology)

This formula is versioned. Any change creates a new DOI. The current version and all prior versions remain permanently citable. See Paper 54 for derivation.

Triggered Disclosures

Individual wipe conditions auto-disclose here when any wipe crosses HIGH threshold. The DAO cannot suppress triggered disclosures — they are computed server-side and published automatically.

Institutional Kill Conditions (IKC-1 through IKC-6)

Architecture Falsification Conditions

These conditions falsify the threat-response architecture itself. Firing an IKC does not falsify the void framework — it falsifies the DAO's specific institutional implementation. IKC-1 and IKC-4 are auto-computed from live API state. IKC-2, 3, 5, 6 require manual reporting. Source: Paper 54, §VI.

Loading IKC status…

Response Log

All threat-level events and published responses. Permanent record. Entries are added automatically when the API detects a level change, and manually when external triggers are filed.

External Escalation Process

How Any Party Can File a Dispute

The DAO cannot self-classify beyond Yellow. Orange and Red require external triggers. Any party — individual, institution, government agency — can file a dispute using the process below.

  1. Yellow (any party): Submit documented criticism to [email protected] or open a GitHub issue on MoreRightDAO/VOID-FRAMEWORK-OPERATION-MORR. The DAO must publish a response within 24 hours.
  2. Orange (institutional actor): File a formal methodology dispute via the same channels, on institutional letterhead. The dispute triggers an external methodology review. Institutional actors include universities, standards bodies, government agencies, and NGOs with established methodological expertise.
  3. Red (legal action): Legal action against the DAO triggers Red automatically. No filing required — court documentation is sufficient.
  4. Kill condition investigation: Any party can nominate a kill condition for investigation. Investigation of a potentially triggered kill condition triggers Red pending external panel review.

All filed disputes and responses are permanently added to the response log above. The DAO cannot remove entries from the log.

Architecture Reference

The threat-response architecture is derived from the void framework's own mathematical foundations. See Paper 54 for the full derivation.

Paper 54 — Full Derivation Kill Conditions Registry DAO Self-Score JSON API ↗