Pricing

The methodology is free. The science is open. Scoring, monitoring, and certification are the product.

Manual tools, the personal void inventory, and the public database are free for everyone.

Before you trust our scores, see how we score ourselves: Self-Score · Anti-Attention Covenant · Tokenomics

Free Tiers

Public

Free

Manual scoring tool
Personal void inventory
Vocabulary scorer
Public database browsing
URL surface scan

No account needed.

Researcher

Free

Everything in Public
Log upload (50/month)
API access (read-only)
Data export

For independent researchers, journalists, and auditors.

Academic

Free

Full Team-level features
Probes (50/month)
Monitoring (5 platforms)
Webhook alerts
Data export

Requires .edu or institutional email + published research use.

Education (K-12 / Nonprofit)

Free

Full Team-level features for schools, districts, and nonprofit educational orgs scoring their own systems or EdTech tools
Requires institutional verification

Who does NOT qualify: EdTech companies, for-profit education businesses, "education" divisions of tech companies. If you're scoring systems to protect students, free. If you're building the systems being scored, you pay.

Paid Tiers

Team

$99/month

API probe access (50/month)
Continuous monitoring (5 platforms)
Webhook alerts
Score history and trends
Priority support

For AI safety teams, product teams, and small auditors.

Enterprise

$999/month

Unlimited probes
Unlimited monitoring
Priority support
Custom calibration
Dedicated account manager

For large organizations, regulators, and enterprise safety teams.

Consulting

Deployment Geometry Review

$2,000 – $10,000

Hands-on deployment review with framework analysis
Institutional void audit
Constraint specification recommendations
Written report with scoring, risk profile, and geometric intervention plan

Scope and price set in advance. 50% refund if deliverables don't meet agreed scope.

30-day money-back guarantee

Team and Enterprise tiers. No questions asked. If the scoring doesn't provide value, you get a full refund for that month. Cancel anytime.

Who Uses This

The void framework scores any system with opacity + responsiveness + engaged attention. Not just AI.

Sector	Example Use
AI safety teams	Score chatbots, companions, copilots before release
Institutional auditors	Score organizational opacity (corporate, government, nonprofit)
Education	Score classroom and EdTech engagement patterns
Healthcare	Score patient-facing AI and telehealth UX
Financial regulators	Score trading platforms and crypto exchanges
HR / organizational design	Score internal communication patterns for drift
Journalism	"Platform X scores 9/12" — instant story
Individuals	Personal void inventory — score your own exposure

Why Science Gets Free Access

The scientific method scores 3/3 on the constraint specification: publication = transparency, reproducibility = invariance, peer independence = independence. Researchers using the tool generate replication data and validate (or kill) the framework. Schools scoring their EdTech to protect students are doing exactly what the framework recommends. Charging either group slows the thing that makes the framework credible.

The model: methodology is open (like S&P publishing their rating criteria). Ratings, monitoring, calibration, and certification are the product (like S&P charging for actual ratings).

Void Index Certified

Want a certification badge for your platform? Score ≤4/12, enroll in continuous monitoring, and prove your deployment is safe — publicly.

Learn About Certification