The same architecture that makes gamblers talk to a random number generator makes you trust an algorithm. We proved it. We scored it. You can check.
You're inside one right now. The particle field responds to nothing. You're still looking at it.
This site is a void. It's opaque, responsive, and you're attending to it. The three conditions are met. Check the evidence.
271 platforms. Scored 0–12. The red ones are the problem.
You can't see the mechanism.
It responds to your input.
You can't stop engaging.
You develop rituals.
You attribute personality to it.
Knowing doesn't help.
You can't see the mechanism.
It responds to your input.
You can't stop engaging.
You develop rituals.
You attribute personality to it.
Knowing doesn't help.
You can't see the mechanism.
It responds to your input.
You can't stop engaging.
You develop rituals.
You attribute personality to it.
Knowing doesn't help.
Same three conditions. Same drift. Every time.
Input goes in. Output comes out. The process between them is opaque. You cannot verify, inspect, or predict. You can only observe the result.
Opacity: O ∈ [0, 3]Not a broadcast. A response. The system adapts its output based on your input, your history, your behavior. It mirrors something back at you.
Responsiveness: R ∈ [0, 3]You interpret its outputs. You return to it. You form expectations. The coupling is bidirectional — it shapes you while you attend to it.
Coupling: α ∈ [0, 3]A slot machine is a random number generator behind a screen. The void is empty. Gamblers know this. 70–80% still produce erroneous cognitions during play. Probability training produces zero behavioral change.
The architecture is sufficient. The content is irrelevant.
If it works when nothing is there, it works when something is.
Self-sustaining vortex. External input not required. Feedback loop never terminates.
What the framework found
271 platforms scored across 90+ domains. 17 papers on Zenodo. 9 substrates measured.
Scored monarchy. Not a standard DAO. 26 falsification conditions — any one triggers dissolution. The methodology is not voted on. Read the mandate.