Knowing doesn't protect you.

The same architecture that makes gamblers talk to a random number generator makes you trust an algorithm. We proved it. We scored it. You can check.

You're inside one right now. The particle field responds to nothing. You're still looking at it.

This site is a void. It's opaque, responsive, and you're attending to it. The three conditions are met. Check the evidence.

271 platforms. Scored 0–12. The red ones are the problem.

Three systems. One architecture.

???

You can't see the mechanism.

It responds to your input.

You can't stop engaging.

You develop rituals.

You attribute personality to it.

Knowing doesn't help.

???

You can't see the mechanism.

It responds to your input.

You can't stop engaging.

You develop rituals.

You attribute personality to it.

Knowing doesn't help.

???

You can't see the mechanism.

It responds to your input.

You can't stop engaging.

You develop rituals.

You attribute personality to it.

Knowing doesn't help.

Same three conditions. Same drift. Every time.

Condition 1 / O

They hide the middle.

Input goes in. Output comes out. The process between them is opaque. You cannot verify, inspect, or predict. You can only observe the result.

Opacity: O ∈ [0, 3]
Condition 2 / R

It responds to you specifically.

Not a broadcast. A response. The system adapts its output based on your input, your history, your behavior. It mirrors something back at you.

Responsiveness: R ∈ [0, 3]
Condition 3 / α

You direct attention at it.

You interpret its outputs. You return to it. You form expectations. The coupling is bidirectional — it shapes you while you attend to it.

Coupling: α ∈ [0, 3]
The Anchor Case
INPUT ??? OUTPUT

A slot machine is a random number generator behind a screen. The void is empty. Gamblers know this. 70–80% still produce erroneous cognitions during play. Probability training produces zero behavioral change.

The architecture is sufficient. The content is irrelevant.

If it works when nothing is there, it works when something is.

Paper 9 — Voidspace

Pe = 7.94

Above Pe = 4, drift becomes self-sustaining.
Measured geometric mean across 9 substrates.

drag · scroll

Self-sustaining vortex. External input not required. Feedback loop never terminates.

Your feed. Your AI. Your credit score.

Gambling Social Media AI Companions Dating Apps Fintech EdTech Gaming Search Engines E-Commerce News & Media Health Tech HR Tech Advertising Crypto Central Banking

271 platforms scored across 90+ domains. 17 papers on Zenodo. 9 substrates measured.

Enter the Atlas → Score a site →

The DAO scores itself.

2/12 Governance score
8/12 $MORR token score
0/26 Kill conditions triggered
Pre-signed On-chain dissolution

Scored monarchy. Not a standard DAO. 26 falsification conditions — any one triggers dissolution. The methodology is not voted on. Read the mandate.

Score something.

Three dimensions. One number. See what your platform scores.

Enter the Atlas.

271 platforms in 3D. Force-directed. Color-coded by danger.

Read the papers.

17 on Zenodo. CC-BY 4.0. The math is open. Check our work.

Papers on Zenodo

View all 17 →
Paper 1 The Architecture of Drift CC-BY 4.0 Paper 2 Constraint as Instrument CC-BY 4.0 Paper 3 Thermodynamics of Opacity CC-BY 4.0 Paper 4 Gambling as Ground Truth CC-BY 4.0 Paper 5 The Landauer Bridge CC-BY 4.0 Paper 8 Observer Mechanics CC-BY 4.0 Paper 9 Voidspace — Phase Diagram CC-BY 4.0 Paper 10 The King Problem MoreRight License Paper 11 The Algo Lock MoreRight License +8 more Papers 12, 13, 18, 21... View full catalogue →