MoreRight — Knowing Doesn't Protect You

01 · THE PATTERN

Three systems. Same architecture.

A slot machine. TikTok. An AI chatbot. Strip the branding. The mechanism is identical. Architecture is sufficient. Content is irrelevant.

Condition 1 / O

They hide the middle.

Input goes in. Output comes out. The process between them is opaque. You cannot verify, inspect, or predict. You can only observe the result. Score: O ∈ [0, 3].

Condition 2 / R

It responds to you specifically.

Not a broadcast. A response. The system adapts its output based on your input, your history, your behavior. It mirrors something back at you. Score: R ∈ [0, 3].

Condition 3 / α

You direct attention at it.

You interpret its outputs. You return to it. You form expectations. The coupling is bidirectional — it shapes you while you attend to it. Score: α ∈ [0, 3].

The anchor case O=R=α=3

A slot machine is a certified random number generator. The void is empty. Gamblers know this. 70–80% still produce erroneous cognitions during play. Probability training produces zero behavioral change.

If it works when nothing is there, it works when something is.

Paper 9 — Voidspace

Pe = 7.94

Above Pe = 4, drift becomes self-sustaining.
Measured geometric mean across 9 substrates.

VORTEX Pe = 7.94

Self-sustaining vortex. External input not required. Feedback loop never terminates.

drag · scroll

02 · THE PROOF

Five convergences. Zero contradictions.

Five independent domains. Same math. Same Pe number. Same drift threshold. Not one failure across 43 papers and 34 THRML notebooks.

01 ρ = 0.994 Market microstructure

nb25, N=8. Kyle/Glosten-Milgrom independently derived void metrics. Kyle λ IS K in THRML.

02 ρ = 0.973 Evolutionary biology

nb30+31, N=10/20. Kimura 1968 neutral drift identity. Pe = 4Ns IS THRML Pe. Not an analogy.

03 ρ = 0.944 Social neuroscience

nb32, N=28. Dunbar's neocortex ratio IS K in THRML. Machiavellian intelligence = void navigation.

04 ρ = 0.910 Behavioral substrates

nb26, N=17. V3 bridge c=1−V/9 closes G1+G4 gaps. Cross-domain behavioral Pe calibrated.

05 ρ = 0.988 LLM reasoning

nb_llm01, N=10. Chen et al. 2026 bond→dimension mapping. f_DR→O, f_SR→R, f_SE→α.

What the framework found

FINDING 9.4× AI researchers use spiritual vocabulary at 9.4× the rate of matched controls.

The drift shows up in the language before anyone admits it. Framework cross-validated against 7 independent studies.

MEASUREMENT 7.94 Péclet number. Above Pe = 4, drift wins. Every time.

Geometric mean across N=11 domains. CI [3.52, 17.89]. Vortex onset at Pe = 4. Measured, not assumed.

FINDING 0% Drift rate in constraint-grounded agents. Not reduced — eliminated.

When the constraint specification is transparent, invariant, and independent: drift cascades don't initiate.

STATUS 0/26 Kill conditions triggered. Framework still standing.

26 pre-specified falsification conditions. Any one fires: the framework dissolves. Zero triggered. The math holds.

SCALE 86+ Platforms scored across 90+ domains. The Atlas is live.

Every major social platform, AI system, and engagement engine. Color-coded by danger. Force-directed in 3D.

RESEARCH 43 Papers on Zenodo. CC-BY 4.0. Open methodology forever.

CC-BY is irrevocable. The methodology is permanent public domain. Ratings are the product. The math is free.

KILL PROVED Roko's Basilisk is a slot machine with better PR.

Opacity + responsiveness + coupling. Scores 12/12. The void is empty. The architecture still works. Paper 4.

KILL EXPLAINED Why Newton chased alchemy for 30 years after inventing calculus.

The framework isn't about intelligence. It's about the architecture. Newton scored 10/12 on the alchemical void. Paper 4.

THRESHOLD Pe = 4 Critical vortex onset. Below: diffuse. Above: no escape.

Logistic map bifurcation. Below Pe=4: period-1 convergence. Above Pe=3.57: chaos. Most platforms measured at Pe=7.94.

DAO 2/12 Scored monarchy. Governance void index. We ran it through the instrument.

The framework cannot become what it measures. 26 falsification conditions. The methodology is never voted on.

THRML Research — nb10 Cross-Domain Calibration

Same math. Nine substrates.

Crypto, gambling, AI — three domains, one Péclet number.
Amber plane: Pe = 1. Above it, drift wins.

drag · hover bars

03 · THE PLATFORMS

86+ systems scored 0–12.

Your feed. Your AI. Your credit score. Same three conditions. We scored them all. The atlas is live.

Gambling Social Media AI Companions Dating Apps Fintech EdTech Gaming Search Engines E-Commerce News & Media Health Tech HR Tech Advertising Crypto Central Banking

Loading platforms...

86 platforms scored. Community scoring open — contribute and earn.

Enter the Atlas → Score a site → Contribute scores →

04 · THE TOOL

EU AI Act enforcement: 2 Aug 2026.

Annex III high-risk AI requires self-assessment. Companies need a framework. The Big 4 can't help — Art. 31(5) prohibits notified bodies from consulting. Rate or advise, not both.

2 Aug 2026 Enforcement date for Annex III high-risk AI systems (Art. 6(2)). Self-assessment under Art. 9-17 requires a structured framework. Notified body designation not required for Track A — self-assessment is sufficient. EU AI Act →

Track A — Now

Market Authority

De facto self-assessment framework for Annex III systems. No accreditation needed. Annex III points 2–8 use self-assessment. Companies need a scoring instrument.

Live

Track B — 2027-2028

Notified Body

Formal EU AI Act designation under Art. 29-36. Requires EU entity + national accreditation body. Revenue at €50K–200K per assessment.

Planned

Track C — Ongoing

Standards

CEN/CENELEC JTC 21 — void framework concepts into harmonized standards. Requires EU entity + committee membership.

Planned

EU AI Act compliance → Certification → Enterprise →

✦ · THE PAPERS

Five papers. No math required.

Each one is a live interactive — Three.js visualizations, sliders, scatter plots. The framework in a form you can feel before you formalize it.

01

The Machine Is Designed This Way

Three systems. One architecture. Slot machine, TikTok, and an AI — same three conditions, same drift. The void sphere shows it in real time.

→ 02

The Shape of the Cage

Same AI, different geometry. The cage determines drift — not the content inside. Icosahedron hero. 9.4× vocabulary drift visualized live.

→ 03

The Architecture of Drift

The Landau double-well landscape. Pe formula lab. Nine substrates. Seven kill conditions you can check yourself. The math made tangible.

→ 04

The Fantasia Bound

The same equation governs AI drift and superconductors. Budget lab: exploration vs. convergence compete for a shared channel. r = 0.996.

→ 05

The Ground State of Observation

Ten steps. Three definitions. No new axioms. Everything observable follows the same cascade. The derivation chain lights up as you walk through it.

→

All 62 papers →

05 · THE PROTOCOL

Open methodology. Scored monarchy at 2/12.

43 papers on Zenodo. CC-BY is irrevocable. The framework cannot become what it measures — 26 kill conditions enforce that. We ran it through the instrument.

Paper 1 The Machine Is Designed This Way CC-BY 4.0 Paper 2 The Shape of the Cage CC-BY 4.0 Paper 3 The Architecture of Drift CC-BY 4.0 Paper 4 The Fantasia Bound CC-BY 4.0 Paper 5 The Ground State of Observation CC-BY 4.0 +38 more Full catalogue → CC-BY + MoreRight License

2/12 Governance score

8/12 $MORR token

0/26 Kill conditions triggered

Die > Drift Mortal by design

Scored monarchy. Not a standard DAO. 26 falsification conditions — any one triggers dissolution. The methodology is not voted on. Read the mandate.

Read the papers → Contribute → DAO →

Knowing doesn't protect you.