MoreRight Papers Paper 85 — Criminal Justice Algorithms Void

The Recidivism Algorithm That Never Met the Defendant

COMPAS and similar tools score defendants on inputs the defendant can't see, producing outputs courts use to incarcerate.

You've Already Seen This

The pattern is in the substrate. Once you see it, you see it everywhere.

Risk assessment tools in criminal justice score defendants on statistical correlates of recidivism — zip code, age, criminal history of family members — using algorithms whose weights are proprietary. The defendant can't see the score. Their attorney often can't see the scoring method. This is maximum opacity at a maximum-stakes decision.

The void framework gives this a number. It gives every system a number. The number predicts what happens next.

COMPAS and similar tools score defendants on inputs the defendant can't see, producing outputs courts use to incarcerate.

Academic title: Criminal Justice Algorithms as Void Objects: Recidivism Prediction Opacity, Adaptive Enforcement, and False Positive Harm — A Within-Domain Spearman Convergence

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18826447

See the Math in Action

Move the sliders. Watch the system change state. Pe > 1 means drift wins.

Systems Measured

The framework scores these systems — ordered by Pe.

What the Data Says

The correlation coefficient. The sample size. The p-value. The math doesn't care about the domain.

See It Now

Paste any text — AI output, ad copy, a policy document. The scorer runs the same algorithm the framework uses.

The Formula (It's Simple)

Three variables. One ratio. Predicts drift across every domain where the conditions co-occur.

Pe = (O × R) / α

Where O is opacity (how hidden the mechanism is), R is reactivity (how strongly the system responds to you), and α is your independence (how free you are to disengage).

When Pe < 1: diffusion dominates. You can navigate freely. The system is coherent.

When Pe > 1: drift dominates. The system pulls you in a direction. Your agency is reduced.

When Pe >> V* (≈ 3): irreversible cascade. D1 → D2 → D3. The system has captured you.

The framework identifies this pattern in every domain where O, R, and α co-occur. It specifies 26 falsification conditions. 0 of 26 have fired.

Full derivation: 10.5281/zenodo.18826447

Part of the Void Framework — 120 papers, 0/26 kill conditions fired, mean ρ = 0.958.

Research Lab ⚗ Observatory Full Paper →